“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any on the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a long way they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of final noticed.
In accordance with the EPA cost schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and never be intended for redistribution to the internet or for commercial purposes.
The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal hasn't challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )
Deterrence: The worry of severe consequences, such as capital punishment, is meant to deter opportunity criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. When the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days with the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
The case addresses A selection of issues including, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment on the grid project and submitted that sufficient mitigation measures were in place to render any potential adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted being developed.
6. Mere involvement inside a heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for your concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, because then He's driving the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is no more expected for further investigation, therefore, his steady incarceration would not provide any helpful purpose at this stage.
Generally, only an appeal accepted with the court of previous resort will resolve this sort of differences and, for many reasons, such appeals tend to be not granted.
The regulation of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the burden presented to any reported judgment may perhaps count on the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[seven]
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion in the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. more info Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--